1 March 11, 2015
Articles and Statements
1. Teimuraz Akhalmosulishvili, Madona Kebadze
For the Issue of Olympic Movement History in Georgia
History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2015, Vol. (14), Is. 1, pp. 4-7.
2. Hope O. Blejh, Ludmila M. RamonovaHistory and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2015, Vol. (14), Is. 1, pp. 4-7.
Abstract:
For its geographical location Georgia represents the part of old cultural world situated on the border of two continents-Europe and Asia. Such location always provided Georgia’s cultural and agricultural promotion during its long history. As it is well-known, from VIII century of old era, on the south-east of the Black Sea and later on the east (Georgian today) coast Greek settlements appeared. First settlements were Sinopi, Pazisi, Gienosi, Dioskuria, etc. Greek settlements also appeared on the west and north coasts of the Black Sea in the VII-VI centuries of the old era. Greek settlements played an important role in the process of cultural-economic development of the Black sea population with the antique world. Keeping in mind the history of old Greece and Georgia’s military-political, economical and cultural relations, it should not be surprising that these relations revealed in sport life that made the basements of Olympic movement in Georgia.
For its geographical location Georgia represents the part of old cultural world situated on the border of two continents-Europe and Asia. Such location always provided Georgia’s cultural and agricultural promotion during its long history. As it is well-known, from VIII century of old era, on the south-east of the Black Sea and later on the east (Georgian today) coast Greek settlements appeared. First settlements were Sinopi, Pazisi, Gienosi, Dioskuria, etc. Greek settlements also appeared on the west and north coasts of the Black Sea in the VII-VI centuries of the old era. Greek settlements played an important role in the process of cultural-economic development of the Black sea population with the antique world. Keeping in mind the history of old Greece and Georgia’s military-political, economical and cultural relations, it should not be surprising that these relations revealed in sport life that made the basements of Olympic movement in Georgia.
The Struggle of the Russian Intelligentsia for the Spiritual Development of Caucasus Krai (the 19th Century)
History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2015, Vol. (14), Is. 1, pp. 8-15.
3. Razhabat M. GichibekovaHistory and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2015, Vol. (14), Is. 1, pp. 8-15.
Abstract:
This article features new little-known materials. Through the example of some of the more prominent representatives of the Russian scientific and creative intelligentsia, the author analyzes certain awareness-raising views on cultural building in the region. The author reveals in a survey/abstract form that interest in the Caucasus had been exhibited by the entire frontline Russian intelligentsia in the persons of its best representatives: A.S. Pushkin, M.Yu. Lermontov, A.S. Griboyedov, L.N. Tolstoy, A.P. Belyayev, A.A. Bestuzhev-Marlinsky, I.G. Burtsov, N.N. Muraviev, P.A. Mukhanov, V.D. Sukhorukov, V.S. Tolstoy, and many others. It has been proven that the ideas of compassion for common people were the basis for the creative work of the Russian general public and were shared by Caucasian thinkers (Adil-Girey, G. Dzasokhov, Kazen-Bek, Khan-Girey, and many others) as well, whose works were published in Russian and Caucasian periodicals. This facilitated the boosting of the national self-consciousness of the mountaineer ethnoses and bolstering mutual friendship between them and great Russian people.
This article features new little-known materials. Through the example of some of the more prominent representatives of the Russian scientific and creative intelligentsia, the author analyzes certain awareness-raising views on cultural building in the region. The author reveals in a survey/abstract form that interest in the Caucasus had been exhibited by the entire frontline Russian intelligentsia in the persons of its best representatives: A.S. Pushkin, M.Yu. Lermontov, A.S. Griboyedov, L.N. Tolstoy, A.P. Belyayev, A.A. Bestuzhev-Marlinsky, I.G. Burtsov, N.N. Muraviev, P.A. Mukhanov, V.D. Sukhorukov, V.S. Tolstoy, and many others. It has been proven that the ideas of compassion for common people were the basis for the creative work of the Russian general public and were shared by Caucasian thinkers (Adil-Girey, G. Dzasokhov, Kazen-Bek, Khan-Girey, and many others) as well, whose works were published in Russian and Caucasian periodicals. This facilitated the boosting of the national self-consciousness of the mountaineer ethnoses and bolstering mutual friendship between them and great Russian people.
“Flexible Means” Employed by the Autocracy in Respect of the People’s Liberation Struggle of the Peoples of the Caucasus in the 1st Half of the 19th Century
History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2015, Vol. (14), Is. 1, pp. 16-23.
4. Sergey A. OreshinHistory and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2015, Vol. (14), Is. 1, pp. 16-23.
Abstract:
This article, based on archive and other materials, describes the methods and means of gaming religious Moslem leaders in the Caucasus on purpose to discredit the standard bearers of the people’s liberation struggle and suppress that struggle. The author brings to light the contradictions within the Moslem clergy of Dagestan subsequent to the end of the people’s liberation struggle of the peoples of the Caucasus in the 2nd half of the 19th-20th centuries. The article examines the mutual relations between the Russian authorities and the Moslem clergy of the Caucasus and specific aspects of the autocracy’s religious policy in the Caucasus in the first third of the 19th century.
This article, based on archive and other materials, describes the methods and means of gaming religious Moslem leaders in the Caucasus on purpose to discredit the standard bearers of the people’s liberation struggle and suppress that struggle. The author brings to light the contradictions within the Moslem clergy of Dagestan subsequent to the end of the people’s liberation struggle of the peoples of the Caucasus in the 2nd half of the 19th-20th centuries. The article examines the mutual relations between the Russian authorities and the Moslem clergy of the Caucasus and specific aspects of the autocracy’s religious policy in the Caucasus in the first third of the 19th century.
The Evolution of the Political System in Stavropol Governorate in 1917
History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2015, Vol. (14), Is. 1, pp. 31-38.
5. Nugzar K. Ter-OganovHistory and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2015, Vol. (14), Is. 1, pp. 31-38.
Abstract:
This article addresses the transformation of state governance in Stavropol Governorate subsequent to the victory of the February Revolution of 1917 and the making and evolution of post-Revolutionary bodies of state authority. Based on archive materials and press publications, the author brings to light the process of creating new institutes of authority and analyzes their social composition and their interrelationship. Special attention is given to the activity of the committees for social security – bodies of self-government that were created by the liberal general public in the spring of 1917 and aspired to run the region – and their operation within the governorate in parallel with the bodies of authority of the Provisional Government. The author comes to the conclusion that the lack of consistency in the actions of the new bodies of authority and their renunciation of social reform for peasants led to the radicalization of the latter, which facilitated the triumph of the proponents of Soviet authority in the governorate in late December, 1917.
This article addresses the transformation of state governance in Stavropol Governorate subsequent to the victory of the February Revolution of 1917 and the making and evolution of post-Revolutionary bodies of state authority. Based on archive materials and press publications, the author brings to light the process of creating new institutes of authority and analyzes their social composition and their interrelationship. Special attention is given to the activity of the committees for social security – bodies of self-government that were created by the liberal general public in the spring of 1917 and aspired to run the region – and their operation within the governorate in parallel with the bodies of authority of the Provisional Government. The author comes to the conclusion that the lack of consistency in the actions of the new bodies of authority and their renunciation of social reform for peasants led to the radicalization of the latter, which facilitated the triumph of the proponents of Soviet authority in the governorate in late December, 1917.
From Military Modernization to Nationalism and a National State in Qajar Iran
History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2015, Vol. (14), Is. 1, pp. 39-50.
6. Galina N. Volnaya (Kertseva)History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2015, Vol. (14), Is. 1, pp. 39-50.
Abstract:
This article examines the historical landmarks of the development of Qajar Iran in the 19th century. Following a number of defeats at the hands of the Russian Empire in the first third of the 19th century, Iran’s leadership started to give serious thought to modernizing its army. The author also touches upon the concept of nationalism in Iran and describes its distinctive characteristics.
This article examines the historical landmarks of the development of Qajar Iran in the 19th century. Following a number of defeats at the hands of the Russian Empire in the first third of the 19th century, Iran’s leadership started to give serious thought to modernizing its army. The author also touches upon the concept of nationalism in Iran and describes its distinctive characteristics.
On the Initial Stage of Gathering the Archeological Collections of the Caucasus Museum
History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2015, Vol. (14), Is. 1, pp. 51-60.
History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2015, Vol. (14), Is. 1, pp. 51-60.
Abstract:
This article was put together based on unpublished materials from the collection of the Caucasus Museum and little-known documentary sources. The author discusses the primary history of the making and development of the Caucasus Museum, which afterwards became the S.N. Dzhanashiya Museum of Georgia. It has been proven that the Caucasus Museum is still of great interest to the scientific community and tourists alike. The institution’s major objective is to explore Caucasus Krai and coterminous countries. The author concludes that the museum still ranks among Russia’s top museums and is considered an institution of great significance.
This article was put together based on unpublished materials from the collection of the Caucasus Museum and little-known documentary sources. The author discusses the primary history of the making and development of the Caucasus Museum, which afterwards became the S.N. Dzhanashiya Museum of Georgia. It has been proven that the Caucasus Museum is still of great interest to the scientific community and tourists alike. The institution’s major objective is to explore Caucasus Krai and coterminous countries. The author concludes that the museum still ranks among Russia’s top museums and is considered an institution of great significance.