1 September 01, 2018
Articles and Statements
1. Ia Shiukashvili
The Scientific Journal "History and Historians in the Context of the Time”: 15 Years Later
History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2018, 16(1): 3-27.
2. Vladimir I. AfanasenkoHistory and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2018, 16(1): 3-27.
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the 15th anniversary of the scientific historical journal “History and Historians in the Context of the Time” and is a brief overview of the articles published during this period, topical issues raised by the authors of issues and discussions.
The article is devoted to the 15th anniversary of the scientific historical journal “History and Historians in the Context of the Time” and is a brief overview of the articles published during this period, topical issues raised by the authors of issues and discussions.
NKVD Troops in the Defense of the Crossings on the Nizhniy Don and on r. Manych in July 1942
History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2018, 16(1): 28-37.
3. Evgeny KrinkoHistory and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2018, 16(1): 28-37.
Abstract:
In mid-July 1942, the troops of the 1st and 4th German tank armies in the Millerovo region surrounded a large grouping of Soviet troops and launched a swift attack to crossings in the lower reaches of the Don River, in the strip from the village of Tsimlyanskaya to Bagaevskaya. A large number of retreating troops, equipment and civilians have accumulated in the areas of crossings. To save hundreds of thousands of lives on the defenses of the ferries, units and units of the NKVD internal troops to guard the rear of the Southern Front were put forward. On the sacrificial feat of Chekist warriors at the Don crossings and at the turn of the river Manych - in this article.
In mid-July 1942, the troops of the 1st and 4th German tank armies in the Millerovo region surrounded a large grouping of Soviet troops and launched a swift attack to crossings in the lower reaches of the Don River, in the strip from the village of Tsimlyanskaya to Bagaevskaya. A large number of retreating troops, equipment and civilians have accumulated in the areas of crossings. To save hundreds of thousands of lives on the defenses of the ferries, units and units of the NKVD internal troops to guard the rear of the Southern Front were put forward. On the sacrificial feat of Chekist warriors at the Don crossings and at the turn of the river Manych - in this article.
The Creation and Fate of the First Mountain Autonomies within the RSFSR (1920–1924)
History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2018, 16(1): 38-48.
4. Artyom Y. PeretyatkoHistory and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2018, 16(1): 38-48.
Abstract:
The article studies the nation-state building in the North Caucasus in the first years after the Civil War. In 1920 two autonomous republics were created – the Mountain Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic and the Dagestan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. It was the first form of Soviet national statehood among the mountaineers of the North Caucasus. Both autonomies were created not by ethnic, but by administrative-territorial principle, since they had a multinational composition of the population. However, their historical fate was different. The Dagestan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic existed until the early 1990s. The Mountain ASSR could not overcome the contradictions between the districts that were part of it, which eventually led to its disintegration. Already in 1921, the Kabardian Autonomous Oblast was separated from the Mountain ASSR. It later was merged with Balkaria into the Kabardino-Balkaria Autonomous Oblast. Then the Karachay-Cherkess Autonomous Oblast was formed. In 1922, the Chechen Autonomous Oblast emerged. In the same 1922, the Cherkess (Adygei) Autonomous Oblast was created, then renamed in the Adygei (Circassian) Autonomous Oblast. In 1924 Mountain ASSR ceased to exist. The Ossetian Autonomous Oblast and the Ingush Autonomous Oblast were formed.
The article studies the nation-state building in the North Caucasus in the first years after the Civil War. In 1920 two autonomous republics were created – the Mountain Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic and the Dagestan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. It was the first form of Soviet national statehood among the mountaineers of the North Caucasus. Both autonomies were created not by ethnic, but by administrative-territorial principle, since they had a multinational composition of the population. However, their historical fate was different. The Dagestan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic existed until the early 1990s. The Mountain ASSR could not overcome the contradictions between the districts that were part of it, which eventually led to its disintegration. Already in 1921, the Kabardian Autonomous Oblast was separated from the Mountain ASSR. It later was merged with Balkaria into the Kabardino-Balkaria Autonomous Oblast. Then the Karachay-Cherkess Autonomous Oblast was formed. In 1922, the Chechen Autonomous Oblast emerged. In the same 1922, the Cherkess (Adygei) Autonomous Oblast was created, then renamed in the Adygei (Circassian) Autonomous Oblast. In 1924 Mountain ASSR ceased to exist. The Ossetian Autonomous Oblast and the Ingush Autonomous Oblast were formed.
Representations of the Cossack in «Pictures of the Last of the Quiet Don»: the Apotheosis of the «Cossack Warrior»
History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2018, 16(1): 49-62.
5. Alla V. ShadrinaHistory and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2018, 16(1): 49-62.
Abstract:
This work is devoted to analyze "Pictures of the last of the Quiet Don" by P.N. Krasnov (1909). In this book, the author creates an ideal image of the Cossack as a "valiant cavalry warrior". He does not consider either the Cossacks Class or the possibility of reforming it. P.N. Krasnov argues that Cossacks should adhere to the "great covenants" and "fine examples" of their ancestors to solve all problems. These covenants are reduced to two principles: the principle of unconditional submission to the authorities and principle of priority of military service. P.N. Krasnov believed that the Cossacks, which did not comply with these two principles, had no right to be considered true Cossacks. This ideology was primitive, but it corresponded to the government policy of 1900, and therefore the book of P.N. Krasnov was released under the auspices of the Don Ataman A.V. Samsonov.
This work is devoted to analyze "Pictures of the last of the Quiet Don" by P.N. Krasnov (1909). In this book, the author creates an ideal image of the Cossack as a "valiant cavalry warrior". He does not consider either the Cossacks Class or the possibility of reforming it. P.N. Krasnov argues that Cossacks should adhere to the "great covenants" and "fine examples" of their ancestors to solve all problems. These covenants are reduced to two principles: the principle of unconditional submission to the authorities and principle of priority of military service. P.N. Krasnov believed that the Cossacks, which did not comply with these two principles, had no right to be considered true Cossacks. This ideology was primitive, but it corresponded to the government policy of 1900, and therefore the book of P.N. Krasnov was released under the auspices of the Don Ataman A.V. Samsonov.
The Founding of the Don Theological Seminary as the Closing Stage of the Formation of Religious Education in the Don Army Land in the second half of the 19th century
History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2018, 16(1): 63-77.
6. History and Historians in the Context of the Time, 2018, 16(1): 63-77.
Abstract:
This publication deals with the closing stage of the formation of religious education in the Don Army Land, which is the founding of the Don Theological Seminary in Novocherkassk in 1868. Based on the studies of the archive sources and pre-revolutionary historiography, the preconditions for the founding of the seminary have been determined as follows: the establishment of an independent diocese in the Don region in 1829, the insufficient education level of the parish priests, which called forth the necessity to educate the priests’ children, the opening of theological schools in the 1820s, and the 1867 reform of religious education. This article covers the preparation stages for the establishment of the seminary, which were connected with the name of Archbishop of Don and Novocherkassk Platon (Gorodetsky): preparing the project for the seminary establishment, for the construction of its classroom blocks, and for financing; defining the peculiar features of the educational process oriented, under Archbishop Platon’s initiative, at teaching missionary activities in an intensified manner; providing the theological school with classroom blocks for temporary use; and forming the managerial and teaching staff of the seminary.
This publication deals with the closing stage of the formation of religious education in the Don Army Land, which is the founding of the Don Theological Seminary in Novocherkassk in 1868. Based on the studies of the archive sources and pre-revolutionary historiography, the preconditions for the founding of the seminary have been determined as follows: the establishment of an independent diocese in the Don region in 1829, the insufficient education level of the parish priests, which called forth the necessity to educate the priests’ children, the opening of theological schools in the 1820s, and the 1867 reform of religious education. This article covers the preparation stages for the establishment of the seminary, which were connected with the name of Archbishop of Don and Novocherkassk Platon (Gorodetsky): preparing the project for the seminary establishment, for the construction of its classroom blocks, and for financing; defining the peculiar features of the educational process oriented, under Archbishop Platon’s initiative, at teaching missionary activities in an intensified manner; providing the theological school with classroom blocks for temporary use; and forming the managerial and teaching staff of the seminary.
full number